Legal Opinion

Storage & Processors, Inc. v. Reyes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2004No. 02-1008PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

In this case, we must decide whether an employer must satisfy the fair notice requirements of the express negligence doctrine and conspicuousness when it enrolls employees in a non-subscriber workers’ compensation benefits plan. Because we hold that employers must, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. 86 S.W.3d 344.

Storage & Processors, Inc. (S & P) is a non-subscriber to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. Tex. Lab.Code § 401.001. On October 22, 1993, Ramon Reyes signed up for a benefits program (“the plan”) offered by S & P to provide him with medical care and wage continuation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Green International, Inc. v. SolisTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Page Petroleum, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Getty Oil Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cate v. Dover Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Gilbane Building Co. v. Admiral InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. Bison Building Materials, Ltd. v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Expro Americas, LLC v. Sanguine Gas Exploration, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Travelers Lloyds Insurance v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API