Legal Opinion

Arthur's Garage, Inc. v. Racal-Chubb Security Systems, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 15, 1999No. 05-96-00556-CVPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

Arthur’s Garage, Inc. a/k/a Arthur’s Mercedes Benz (Arthur’s Garage) sued Racal-Chubb Security Systems, Inc., Ra-cal Corporation, and Chubb Security Systems, Inc., (Racal-Chubb) for damages it sustained when a smoke detector failed to operate during a fire on the garage premises. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Racal-Chubb on the ground that Racal-Chubb’s liability was contractually limited to $350. The trial court also granted summary judgment in favor of Racal-Chubb on its claim for indemnity from Arthur’s Garage against third-party…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Abbott, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. Qaddura v. Indo-European Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  3. Head v. U.S. Inspect DFW, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. COC Services, Ltd. v. CompUSA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  5. Hubbert v. Dell Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API