Segal v. Emmes Capital, L.L.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
SAM NUCHIA, Justice.
Appellants Richard J. Segal and Judith Segal (“the Segals”) have moved for rehearing, as have appellants Joe Fogarty and Nancy Fogarty (“the Fogartys”). Ap-pellee, Emmes Capital, L.L.C. (“Emmes”), has responded to both rehearing motions. We have granted the Segals’ unopposed motion to supplement the appellate record on rehearing. We now grant the rehearing motions. Although we withdraw our opinion and judgment dated October 10, 2002 and issue this opinion and judgment in their place, our ultimate disposition of the trial court’s judgment remains…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Mehrdad Moayedi v. Interstate 35/chisam Road, L.P. and Malachi Development CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- PAS, INC. v. Engel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- McCoy v. Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- in the Interest of S.N., S.M.N., and D.A.N., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Gerald Godoy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.