McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT, Justice.
The appellant, McCarthy Well Company, Inc., was hired by St. Peter Creamery, Inc., to restore the creamery’s artesian well to its original capacity. Because McCarthy Well was not paid in full, it brought suit against the creamery seeking to recover $23,422.02 plus interest for work done on the well pursuant to the parties’ agreement. The creamery asserted counterclaims, alleging that McCarthy Well negligently performed the work, resulting in damage to the creamery’s dried milk products. A jury found that both McCarthy Well and the creamery were negligent as to the work…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Cease Electric Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. v. Mandalay Resort GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- AKA Distributing Company v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- David v. HettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.