Oakville Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
The merchandise under protest herein involves common pins manufactured in the United States and shipped in bulk to Canada where they were packaged in lots of 5,000 pins on a paper tape, wound onto a wooden core forming a wheel-like roll, with two cardboard side discs stapled to the wooden core.
*80The pins on rolls (represented by exhibit 1) were thereafter returned to the United States and entered as duty-free merchandise under paragraph 1615(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (T.D. 49646).
The collector of customs, however, rejected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Denike v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Lunham v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Superscope, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Oakville Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967