Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1954No. C. D. 1628PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The controversy in this case involves the duty assessed by the collector upon four motorboats imported from Canada, containing inboard motors, three of which were Chrysler crown engines manufactured by the Chrysler Corp. of Detroit, Mich., and one a Nordberg engine, manufactured by Nordberg Manufacturing Co. of Milwaukee, Wis. The motorboats and engines were returned by the appraiser as “one motor boat complete with engine,” in some instances “installed and ready to run,” and in others “except for being bolted to supporting structure” or “frame.” Duty was assessed upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denike v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. Auto Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  4. Fenderson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Baylis Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Consolidated Sewing Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Import Export Service of New Jersey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Ferriswheel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API