Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Durham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1987No. 8714SC343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Paul and Louise Hall, Luther and Dorothy Hammond, and the Latta Road Neighborhood Association, Inc., filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment concerning the validity of a rezoning amendment adopted by the Durham City Council (the Council), which rezoned approximately 12.9 acres of land near the intersection of Roxboro and Latta Roads in Durham. The Complaint alleged that the rezoning was invalid because (1) a valid protest petition filed pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 160A-385 on behalf of residents of the neighborhood near the rezoned property made a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Allred v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Clark's Greenville, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kerik v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Budd v. Davie CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Kerik v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Kerik v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API