Legal Opinion
Murray v. Puls
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 2004No. A04-319, A04-403PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, appellants challenge the district court’s confirmation of an arbitration award and argue that (1) the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion to confirm the award; (2) the district court erred by concluding that the arbitration agreement was ambiguous; and (3) the district court erred by finding that the arbitration agreement allowed respondent to pursue a claim for underin-sured-motorist (UIM) benefits., Because we conclude that the district court had jurisdiction to hear the motion to confirm the arbitration award and that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Bradley v. BradleyWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Warren E. Johnson Companies v. Unified Brand, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Brian F. Leonard v. Executive Risk IndemnityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008