Bradley v. Bradley
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[T1] Robert H. Bradley (Husband) appeals from the district court's order granting a partial summary judgment in favor of Da-yelle Fargey Bradley (Wife). The court ruled, as a matter of law, that Minnesota law applied to the modification provision of the parties' premarital agreement and their post-nuptial amendment to the agreement was unenforceable because it did not comply with Minnesota statutes. Husband claims that the district court erred by interpreting the premarital agreement as requiring the application of Minnesota law to the modification provision. We conclude that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Cook v. Shoshone First BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. LorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stone v. Devon Energy Production Co., LPWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Denbury Onshore, Llc and Denbury Resources Inc. N/K/A Denbury Inc. v. Apmtg Helium LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Brendon A. Boyce v. Julie A. Jarvis, f/k/a Julie A. BoyceWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Lfp Consulting, Llc, a North Dakota Limited Liability Company v. David Edward LeightonWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.