Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 21, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 9061PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONALD R. KUNZ, Judge Pro Tern. *

In this appeal, appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) challenges the trial court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court ruled that appellees Arlo and Ofelia Janssen, who were injured by an uninsured driver while traveling in their 1977 Datsun, were entitled to recover under the $100,000/$300,000 uninsured motorist (UM) coverage in a separate State Farm policy on the Janssens’ other car, a 1973 Volkswagen. State Farm also contests the trial court’s determination that it would not be legally…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DimmerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Green v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API