Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeon
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioners seek review of a decision denying insurance benefits under a policy’s “named driver exclusion.” We granted review to define the permissible application of such clauses to uninsured motorist coverage, a matter of first impression in Arizona. Rule 23(a), Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The facts are undisputed. Joan and Robert McKeon purchased automobile insurance with Employers Mutual Casualty Company (Employers) with limits of $300,-000 for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Spain v. Valley Forge InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Howell v. Balboa Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GilmoreArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Pierce v. Oklahoma Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.