Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeon

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1988No. CV-87-0312-PRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Petitioners seek review of a decision denying insurance benefits under a policy’s “named driver exclusion.” We granted review to define the permissible application of such clauses to uninsured motorist coverage, a matter of first impression in Arizona. Rule 23(a), Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

The facts are undisputed. Joan and Robert McKeon purchased automobile insurance with Employers Mutual Casualty Company (Employers) with limits of $300,-000 for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Spain v. Valley Forge InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Howell v. Balboa Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GilmoreArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Pierce v. Oklahoma Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API