Legal Opinion

In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 2006No. A05-471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

Following respondent the Minnesota Racing Commission’s vote to deny respondent North Metro Harness, Inc.’s application for a Class A racetrack license, commissioners received new information outside of the record that settled concerns underlying the application denial. The commission sua sponte moved to reconsider its decision, and after reopening the record to receive new information, granted the application. On this appeal, relator Columbus Concerned Citizens, Inc. argues that the commission did not have authority or jurisdiction to sua sponte move to reconsider its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Little v. Arrowhead Regional CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. In the Matter of the License of Blaine Myles MacDonald, D.C. License No. 3343.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Minnesota Internship Center, Relator v. Minnesota Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API