Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of Shorewood

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

In this land-use dispute, appellant argues that it has the inherent authority to amend respondent’s CUP to reflect the representations that respondent made in its CUP application regarding its intended use of the property. Respondent contends that appellant cannot unilaterally amend its CUP. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent.

FACTS

Respondent Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club owns a marina in Shorewood. In 1969, appellant City of Shorewood granted respondent a three-year special-use permit that limited the number and types of boats…