Legal Opinion

Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1993No. C5-92-2204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

By writ of certiorari, relator John F. Nieszner contends that (1) employer Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training failed to make a timely appeal from the initial claims adjudicator’s determination that relator was not disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits; (2) further review by a different adjudicator violated provisions of Minn.Stat. ch. 268 and his right to due process; and (3) the Commissioner’s representative erroneously decided employer discharged relator for misconduct. We reverse.

FACTS

Relator, a 24-year employee of the Minnesota Department of Jobs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Markel v. City of Circle PinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Sandstrom v. Douglas MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Hart-Wilke v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. In Re the Claim for Benefits by HagertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Lolling v. Midwest PatrolCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Timothy Myers, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Health, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API