Legal Opinion
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Hagert
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 2007No. A06-1141PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
This case involves a retired peace officer’s eligibility to receive continued health-insurance benefits until age 65 under MinmStat. § 299A.465 (2004 <& Supp.2005) when the retirement was caused by injuries sustained while performing his or her occupational duties. Appellant challenges the decision of the Public Safety Officers Benefit Eligibility Panel denying him continued health-insurance benefits under section 299A.465 because the injuries appellant sustained in a traffic accident while responding to a theft report did not result from an occupational duty “unique to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Claim for Benefits by SlettenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007