Legal Opinion

Closed Loop Marketing, Inc. v. Closed Loop Marketing, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 13, 2008No. CIV. S-08-1500 LKK/DADPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant are both companies engaged in the business of, inter alia, internet marketing consulting and advertising consulting. At the time this action was filed, plaintiff and defendant both operated under the name “Closed Loop Marketing,” although defendant argues that it has since adopted the name “CLM.” Plaintiff brings this action alleging that it has a protectable interest in the trade name Closed Loop Marketing, and that defen dant has infringed upon this interest and diluted the name.

Before the court are two motions:…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ricks v. BMEzine. Com, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
  2. United Oil Heat, Inc. v. M.J. Meehan Excavating, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. Schoene v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API