Legal Opinion
Schoene v. Christensen
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 10, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00693Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KIMBERLY M. SCHOENE, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00693-AN Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER PENELOPE CHRISTENSEN and PORTLAND HAIR EXTENSIONS BY PENELOPE, Defendants. Pro se plaintiff Kimberly M. Schoene ("plaintiff") brings this action against defendants Penelope Christensen and Portland Hair Extensions by Penelope ("defendants"), alleging federal and state law trademark, unfair competition, and unfair trade practices claims. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF [2], on May 11, 2023. The Court finds that oral arguments…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.