Legal Opinion
State v. Jurgensen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 27, 1996No. 13607PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) excluded testimony that a police informant was paid to entrap him, (2) denied the defendant’s request for a Secondino charge; see Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co., 147 Conn. 672, 165 A.2d 598 (1960); (3) denied the defendant’s request for a continuance, and (4) denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- United States v. David Guillette and Robert JoostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ConnellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. StevensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. TOMAS D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Harold Cohn & Co. v. Harco International, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Ormsby v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.