Legal Opinion
Harold Cohn & Co. v. Harco International, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 3, 2002No. AC 22093PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendants, Harco International, LLC (Harco), and Christopher Komondy, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Harold Cohn and Company, Inc. (Cohn), Prairie Dog Trading Company, Inc. (Prairie Dog), and Robert W. Dickerson. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) admitted evidence in violation of the parol evidence rule and (2) found that the *45plaintiffs had proven fraud in the inducement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court found the following facts. At all times relevant, Dickerson was the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- A. Sangivanni & Sons v. F. M. Floryan & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Douglas E. Wall v. Csx Transportation, Inc. And Consolidated Rail Corporation, Docket No. 05-4065-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Alstom Power, Inc. v. Balcke-Durr, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.