Ginocchio v. Coffman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling the account of an administrator. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The administrator appeals from an order charging him with interest, on settlement of his second account, from the date of the settlement of his first account.
In his second account, which was filed February 16, 1898, after an order of the court had been made to show cause why he should not make the account, the administrator charged himself with seven thousand nine hundred and seventy-nine dollars and seventy-nine cents balance cash on hand from last report. The first account was settled July 28, 1891. In the second account, which is duly verified, the administrator makes a statement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wheeler v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Biddle v. ReysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Estate of BoyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of De BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ritter v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.