Biddle v. Reys
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County settling the final account of administrators. Wheaton A. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The administrators of the above estate have appealed from the order settling their final account and directing a disposition of the estate in their hands. The estate is insolvent, and the account was contested by the surviving widow and one of the creditors of the deceased. The court disallowed some of the items of expenditures set up in the account and held that the administrators should be charged with compound interest upon certain moneys in their hands from the time of their receipt.
1. A former account of their receipts and expenditures prior to June 24, 1894, filed by them December 5,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wheeler v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Walls v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- In re Estate of SpanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- De Greayer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Purcell v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neighbours v. RittenhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ginocchio v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re Estate of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- L. Harter Co. v. GeiselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hill Ex Rel. Northern Trust Co. v. HannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.