Legal Opinion

Pelzer v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The action is to recover on certain promissory notes. The summonses and complaints were served on April 10, 1922. The defendant’s time to answer was extended to May 8, 1922, by stipulation, which also stated “ the issue in said action to date as if no extension had been granted.” On May 6, 1922, the actions were removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. A motion was made to remand the causes which came on to be heard May 12, 1922, on which date the defendant served its answers to the complaints. The causes were remanded by orders entered May…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coler v. LambAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Stehli Silks Corp. v. KleinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Davis v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stern v. George P. Ide & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Ardell Marine Corp. v. DuchinskyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Franks v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Rockowitz Corset & Brassiere Corp. v. Madame X Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API