Rockowitz Corset & Brassiere Corp. v. Madame X Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
This cause was tried in October, 1925, and a permanent injunction granted restraining the defendants from infringing upon plaintiff’s trade-mark. An appeal was taken which is now pending *837before the Appellate Division. Defendants move to vacate the judgment on the ground that it was obtained by fraud and perjury, and by concealment and suppression of evidence, and seek a new trial because of newly-discovered evidence. A separate motion is also made by defendants Weil to declare the action as to them settled by reason of an alleged stipulation in writing dated October 5, 1925, and signed by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frohlich v. ZeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- People v. PrimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Hagen v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Pelzer v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Herrman v. AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strum v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1947