Legal Opinion

Ardell Marine Corp. v. Duchinsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtA. David Benjamin, J.

Application by defendant for reargnment of a motion to resettle an order of this court dated April 11, 1958.

Plaintiff argues that there is presently no action pending between the parties hereto; that as a matter of right, by notice dated April 7, 1958, it voluntarily discontinued this cause pursuant to rule 301 (subd. 1, par. [a]) of the Rules of Civil Practice before service of an answer by the defendant.

In the instant action an answer was interposed to the original complaint. Thereafter plaintiff served an amended complaint which this defendant moved to dismiss under rule 106 of the Rules…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. HilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Pelzer v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Fitzgerald v. RobrickNew York Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Irrigation & Industrial Development Corp. v. Indag S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fun Fair Park, Inc. v. Gabor Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API