Legal Opinion

Stehli Silks Corp. v. Kleinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Nathan J. Kleinberg, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 14th day of December, 1921, granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action was commenced May 16, 1919, and is brought to recover the purchase price of three hundred pieces of crepe georgette, whereof thirty-nine pieces were delivered to, and accepted by, defendant, and tender of the remaining pieces was made to defendant, who refused to accept or pay for the same. In the complaint it was alleged that the deliveries were to be made during January, February, March and April. In the answer, after certain denials, there were set forth (1) a separate and partial defense; (2) a further answer of tender of the amount conceded by defendant to be due…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. HilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Pelzer v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Feldman v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948
  4. Black v. BlackNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Ecker v. MyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API