Legal Opinion
State v. Burnham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 6, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Walter Burnham appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) following his entry of a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of operating a motor vehicle with a blood-alcohol content greater than 0.08% by weight. 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Pamph. 1991). Burnham challenges the court’s rulings that the stop of his vehicle was supported by a reasonable and articulable suspicion, and that the certificate of the chemist who analyzed Burnham’s blood sample, offered pursuant to Section 1312, 1 was ad missible prior to the admission of evidence (from a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. DulacSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- State v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- State v. CusackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- State v. ConnorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State v. ConnorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009