Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 3, 1985PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

A Superior Court jury, Penobscot County, convicted the defendant of operating a motor vehicle when his operator’s license was suspended under the habitual offender statute. 29 M.R.S.A. 2298 (1983). He appeals from the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence of his habitual offender status on the ground that it was illegally obtained. He also argues that certain evidence, without which, he asserts, he could not have been convicted, was inadmissible hearsay. Because the evidence of his habitual offender status was obtained as a result of an unjustified…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. CaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. State v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. State v. MoultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. State v. DulacSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API