State v. Pinkham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
HORNBY, Justice.
The question in this case is whether a police officer has “specific and articulable facts” to justify stopping and warning a driver when he observes improper driving behavior not worthy of a citation for a traffic infraction. Concluding that a civil or criminal infraction is not always essential and that safety reasons alone could justify such a stop, we vacate the judgment of the District Court (Skowhegan, MacNi-chol, J.) that granted the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and remand for further proceedings.
At about 2:00 A.M. on a summer Sunday morning a police officer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HarrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. Terry King and Valerie Jean BurdexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. FieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. LovegrenMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.