Legal Opinion

State v. Pinkham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 24, 1989PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORNBY, Justice.

The question in this case is whether a police officer has “specific and articulable facts” to justify stopping and warning a driver when he observes improper driving behavior not worthy of a citation for a traffic infraction. Concluding that a civil or criminal infraction is not always essential and that safety reasons alone could justify such a stop, we vacate the judgment of the District Court (Skowhegan, MacNi-chol, J.) that granted the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and remand for further proceedings.

At about 2:00 A.M. on a summer Sunday morning a police officer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. HarrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry King and Valerie Jean BurdexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. FieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. LovegrenMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API