Legal Opinion
State v. Eastman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 12, 1997PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Defendant, Randy Eastman, appeals the judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Crowley, J.) convicting him of operating under the influence of intoxicants in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411 (1996). Defendant argues on appeal that the District Court (Biddeford, MacNichol, J.) erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence ultimately admitted against him at trial and makes several other constitutional arguments not presented to the trial court. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] The facts as developed at trial may be summarized as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Commonwealth v. BlaisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- State v. ReesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. WebsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. CarrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.