Gust K. Newberg Construction Company, an Illinois Corporation v. E.H. Crump & Company, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Gust K. Newberg Construction Company (“Newberg”), the plaintiff in this case, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant, E.H. Crump & Company (“Crump”) following a bench trial. In this diversity action, the district court held that Crump had no duty, under Florida law, 1 to inform Newberg that an “all risk” insurance policy purchased by Newberg to cover its risk of loss regarding a construction project in Dade County, Florida, excluded loss caused by subsurface water. Under the circumstances of this case, we agree and therefore affirm.
I
Newberg,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Afram Export Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Sobotor v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Cynthia Gilardi v. Gary Schroeder, D/B/A Gary Schroeder TruckingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- VISION ONE v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Mutuelle Generale Francaise Vie v. Life Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LinnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.