Mutuelle Generale Francaise Vie v. Life Assurance Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Mutuelle Generale Francaise Vie (“MGF”) has filed a seven-count Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) against Life Assurance Company of Pennsylvania (“LA-COP”). 1 All of MGF’s asserted causes of action, including claims of fraud and breach of contract, arise from a reinsurance contract or “treaty” between the parties.
LACOP has moved to dismiss the Complaint under:
1. Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted;
2. Rules 8(a) and 8(e)(1), for violation of their requirements of “a short and plain…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Briscoe v. LahueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- The Marmon Group, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Reid v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- North River Insurance v. Philadelphia Reinsurance Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Khalid Bin Talal Bin Abdul Azaiz Al Seoud v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Bonfield v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.