Legal Opinion
Board of County Commissioners v. Heath
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 10, 1930No. 12,152PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
We hereinafter refer to defendants in error as plaintiffs, and to plaintiffs in error as the commissioners, the directors, and the trust company, respectively.
TMs cause is here for the second time. Our former opinion (Commissioners v. Heath, 79 Colo. 429, 246 Pac. 794) should he read in connection with this.
The district issued $673,000 of six per cent interest coupon bonds. Of those due in 1925 plaintiffs held four $500 bonds and one hundred and one $15 interest coupons, all of the total face value of $3,515. The commissioners, in making the levy in 1924 for the tax of 1925, did not increase…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Thomas v. Henrylyn Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Board of County Commissioners v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Heath v. Green City Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Wilcox v. Riverview Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.