Thomas v. Henrylyn Irrigation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiee in error Theodore H. Thomas, is hereinafter referred to as “ Thomas ’ ’; plaintiff in error Henry Howard, Jr., as “Howard”; defendant in error the Henrylyn Irrigation District (and its hoard of directors) as “the district”; defendant in error the hoard of county commissioners of Weld county as “the county”; and all the defendants in error as “defendants.” Interstate Trust Co. v. M. V. Irr. Dist., 66 Colo. 219, 181 Pac. 123, is hereinafter referred to as “the Montezuma ease”; Henrylyn Irr. Dist. et al. v. Thomas, 66 Colo. 296, 181 Pac. 979, as “the demand case”; and Henrylyn Irr.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Henrylyn Irrigation District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Henrylyn Irrigation District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Board of County Commissioners v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Heath v. Green City Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.