Legal Opinion
Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. Hollingsworth
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 28, 1934No. 989PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeDERMOTT,, Circuit Judge.
Action at law upon unpaid bonds and attached coupons issued by appellant and owned by appellee, a nonresident. After a motion to dismiss was denied, the district by its answer admitted that, pursuant to the statute creating the district, the bonds were authorized by a majority of the electors of the district; alleged that they were voted to pay for an irrigation system which was to be completely constructed before the bonds were issued; that in December, IMS, the district agreed to deliver to one Loekhard the entire $200',000 issue in payment for a completed…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Brinkley v. HassigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Smith v. Lykes Brothers-Ripley S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Henderson v. United States Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Rhodes v. MeyerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1963
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.