Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Heath

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 3, 1926No. 11,492PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Heath, petitioner below, obtained a peremptory mandamus against the county commissioners of Adams county, the directors of the North Denver Irrigation District and the assessor and treasurer of Adams county, requiring the levy and collection of certain taxes upon lands within the irrigation district to pay district bonds held by him.

For simplicity we shall refer to Heath alone as petitioner and defendant in error. Both sides ask us to determine the case upon motion for supersedeas, full briefs having been filed.

The judgment must be reversed. The essential facts are as follows: (We give all…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hall v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Miners & Merchants Bank v. HerronArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Heath v. Green City Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API