In Re Faro Technologies Securities Litigation
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANNE C. CONWAY, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Magistrate Judge David A. Baker’s August 7, 2007' Report and Recommendation (R & R) (Doc. 99), as well as the parties’ objections thereto (Docs. 100 & 102) and responses to those objections (Docs. 103 & 104).
In the R & R, Judge Baker determined that the Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint (SAC) (Doc. 72) satisfies federal pleading standards applicable to securities fraud actions with respect to the claims asserted against the FARO Defendants. Judge Baker reached the opposite conclusion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Petrochina Co. Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- In Re Semgroup Energy Partners, L.P.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
- Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania v. PetersDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
- Lewis v. SeneffDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.