Legal Opinion

George v. George

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1935No. 3082PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

Respondent instituted suit against appellant to obtain a decree dissolving the bonds of matrimony. Appellant has appealed from an adverse judgment and from the order denying her motion for a new trial.

The cause of action alleged in the complaint is that plaintiff and defendant, for a period of more than five consecutive years next prior to the filing of the complaint, had lived apart continuously without cohabitation. Such living apart is, in the discretion of the court, a ground for divorce. Stats. 1931, c. 111, p. 180; Herrick v. Herrick, 55 Nev. 59, 25 P.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herrick v. HerrickNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
  3. Guillot v. GuillotSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1919

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Matysek v. MatysekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Benson v. BensonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gerdts v. GerdtsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Calhoun v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API