Legal Opinion
Herrick v. Herrick
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1933No. 2993PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, J.:
This is an action for divorce. It will be convenient to refer to the parties as husband and wife.
The husband, as plaintiff, charged “that plaintiff and defendant have lived apart for five consecutive years without cohabitation.” In this connection it was also alleged in the complaint that they ceased living together, as husband and wife on the 28th day of June 1923. A demurrer to the complaint having been overruled, the wife answered. The answer admitted the separation alleged in the complaint and set out matter to show that it was due to the husband’s fault.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bushnell v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Blankenship v. BlankenshipNevada Supreme Court · 1929
- Cooke v. . CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- North v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Parks v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.