Legal Opinion

Gerdts v. Gerdts

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1936No. 30,711PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendant appeals from the judgment granting an absolute divorce to plaintiff. The four assignments of error are all directed against the conclusion of law. The findings of fact are not chal lenged. The parties were married January 6, 1906, in this state and have since continuously resided therein. Plaintiff was 54 and defendant 45 years of age when this action ivas begun. They have five children living, all now of age. One of plaintiff’s grounds for absolute divorce was that continuously for more than five years since February 16, 1929, when a decree of separation, or limited…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Schuster v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Stallings v. StallingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Matthews v. LomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gleason v. GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Matysek v. MatysekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Bull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Cassaro v. CassaroOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. IMC Global v. Continental InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API