Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 20, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStearns, C. J.

This cause is here on the exception of the respondent to the decision of a justice of the .Superior Court granting a divorce to the petitioner on the ground that the parties had lived separate and apart for ten years (G. L. 1923, C. 291, s. 3) and denying the cross-motion of respondent for a divorce on the ground of adultery.

The petition in this proceeding was filed July 29, 1932, the cross-motion September 15, 1932. Thereafter by consent of the respondent, petitioner, on' September 25, 1933, the day on which the cause was heard, amended his petition by adding to the charge of living separate…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matysek v. MatysekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. George v. GeorgeNevada Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stanzler v. StanzlerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. Courson v. CoursonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API