State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Vue Pao Yang
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*566Opinion
ARDAIZ, P. J.
Appellant Vue Pao Yang was insured by respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. State Farm brought a declaratory relief action against Yang and sought an adjudication that Yang was not covered by the “Uninsured Motor Vehicle” and “Medical Payments” coverages of his State Farm automobile insurance policy for damages he suffered as a result of being shot by a gunman who fired from a car and then sped away. Yang had been standing near his apartment at the time of the shooting. The trial court found no coverage and entered judgment in favor of State Farm.
Facts
T…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Southern Farm Bur. Cas. Ins. v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Progressive Choice Insurance v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013