Legal Opinion
Cucuzza v. City of Santa Clara
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 2002No. H023698PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Sue Cucuzza sued her employer, the City of Santa Clara (City) under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) Plaintiff claimed that beginning in 1993 City had unlawfully discriminated against her by limiting her job duties to clerical and administrative tasks and assigning technical duties to less qualified men. City filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the statute of limitations barred any action on most of the adverse actions alleged and that it had a legitimate, nondiscriminatory explanation for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Hersant v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Alch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- DeJung v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- McGrory v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.