Legal Opinion

Multnomah County v. Burbank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, C. J.

This is a proceeding brought by Multnomah County to condemn for use as a public park certain land owned by defendants. On the day set for trial of the case plaintiff moved for a voluntary nonsuit which was granted. Defendants thereafter filed a cost bill including an item of $1,800 as an attorney’s fee, to which item the plaintiff objected. After a hearing the court allowed the cost bill, including the attorney’s fee in the sum of $1,800. Plaintiff appeals.

The question presented is whether ORS 281.330 authorizes the allowance of an attorney’s fee to defendant in a condemnation proceeding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Cereghino v. State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. GanongOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Warm Springs Irrigation Dist. v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Re Petition of ReederOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Brookshire v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Braat v. AndrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hewitt v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State Highway Commission v. StockhoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API