Legal Opinion
Cereghino v. State Highway Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1962PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LU»SK, J.
The appeals in these oases were consolidated for hearing in this court because they involve identical questions.
The plaintiffs, owners of agricultural lands in Multnomah county, brought these actions against the state of Oregon, acting by and through its State Highway Commission, to recover damages for injury to their lands caused by the construction by the defendant of a state highway. The Cereghino case was tried by a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $4,250, with interest at the rate of sis per cent per annum from January 1, 1956. The Hall and Tegart…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Hawkins v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Hans Hoeck v. City of Portland, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.