Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Re Petition of Reeder

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The appellants challenge the validity of the establishment of the county road described in these proceedings, and likewise appeal from the assessment of damages awarded them upon the verdict of the jury by order of the Circuit Court.

If the Board of County Commissioners has exercised its judicial functions erroneously, or has exceeded its jurisdiction in the matter of the establishment of the county road involved in this proceeding, the appellants’ remedy for that wrong is by the writ of review: Or. L., §§ 602-611.

*489But appellants, relying upon the provisions of the act of 1917, contend that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HawkOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Fanning v. GillilandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. GanongOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Renshaw v. Lane County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Schmid v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tomten v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Nyman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API