Legal Opinion

Braat v. Andrews

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs to condemn an easement across defendants’ land. Judgment was entered in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs appeal, contending that the trial court erred in entering an order nunc pro tunc which, awarded defendants their attorney fees.

Plaintiffs, relying upon OES 772.305, ① Art. I, § 18 of the Oregon Constitution, ② and OES Chapter 35 as amended in 1971, sought to condemn an easement across defendants’ land for an irrigation pipeline. Defendants interposed a demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint, which was sustained on the ground that since plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morphet v. MorphetOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dugger v. LaulessOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bailey v. SteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hubbard v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Koennecke v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bakker v. Baza'r, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lowe v. Institutional Investors TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Condliff v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Blue Horse v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API