King v. Oakley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an appeal by Thelma Mae King, W. T. Brockus and Wilma Ruth Broclcus, his wife (defendants below), from a judgment in favor of W. R. Oakley and Marie Oakley, his wife (plaintiffs below), whereby the title to certain real estate was quieted in plaintiffs. The judgment denied defendants’ contention that plaintiffs’ action was to rescind a real estate purchase contract between plaintiffs and defendants and the use of such remedy required plaintiffs to restore to W. T. Brockus the amount he had paid to plaintiffs as a down payment on .the purchase price.
On January 18,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- United Farmers' City Market, Inc. v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- F. & M. Drilling Co. v. M. & T. Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Lea v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Richardson v. Mustang Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Holden v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- In Re First Penn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.