Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Estate of Chapman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1948No. 30496PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— The appellants sued the estate of E. W. Chapman, deceased, and respondent Harlan S. Callahan as sheriff of King county, alleging in their amended complaint that during the time the sheriff had possession of the dairy herd of the appellants, under a writ of attachment wrongfully sued out by E. W. Chapman, the cattle were cared for

“. . . in such a careless and negligent manner that their value was greatly diminished and that the reasonable and just damages due to the plaintiffs [appellants] was and is in the sum of $3552.53.”

To this amended complaint, the administratrix of the estate of E. W.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kerr v. . MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. McMahan v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. First Sec. Bank of Utah, N.A. United States v. Allen. United States v. Cota (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  2. Purtell v. TehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Capper v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Dunlap v. WildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Daniels v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API