Campbell v. Blount
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
In their first and sixth assignments of error, defendants contend the court erred in allowing a recovery based on quantum meruit. We reject this contention.
The evidence tended to show: On 29 March 1972, following negotiations, plaintiff and the male defendant executed a document entitled “Description op Materials” setting forth detailed specifications for labor and materials for the home. Defendants also provided plaintiff with detailed drawings or blueprints and soon after 29 March 1972, plaintiff began construction. On or about 3 May 1972, after plaintiff had performed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vetco Concrete Company v. TROY LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Miles F. Bixler Co. v. BrittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Littlejohn v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Keith v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Billups v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brokers, Inc. v. High Point City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Geoscience Grp., Inc. v. Waters Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.