Coggins v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
In this action the plaintiff asked the court, (1) to restrain the defendants from performing their contract inter se; and (2) to restrain the City of Asheville from issuing bonds or using the bond proceeds to finance the contract. The evidentiary facts are not in dispute. However, only the ultimate facts found by the court and its conclusions of law based thereon are challenged.
In cases involving a temporary rather than a permanent restraining order, the court’s findings of fact are not binding on the appellate court which may make its own findings. McIntosh North Carolina…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Atkins v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Teer v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Matter of WhisnantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Stachlowski v. StachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.